Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law

Carsten Becker skrev:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:47:12 -0400, Tim Smith
> <tim.langsmith@...> wrote:
>
>> I thought that there _was_ a case in which a US federal court decided
>> that you can't copyright a language (con- or nat-).
>
> But language *materials* like a written grammar, (faked) artefacts and
> illustrative documents and dictionaries are under copyright, aren't they?
>
> Regards
> Carsten
>
>
>
Yes, that's not the issue here.

/BP