Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law

Hello,

On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:47:12 -0400, Tim Smith
<tim.langsmith@...> wrote:

>I thought that there _was_ a case in which a US federal court decided
>that you can't copyright a language (con- or nat-).
But language *materials* like a written grammar, (faked) artefacts and
illustrative documents and dictionaries are under copyright, aren't they?

Regards
Carsten

Replies