Re: Unicode yogh?

Lars Henrik Mathiesen scripsit:

> I'm sure it's due to ME that Unicode renamed its old yogh glyph to ezh
> in 1.1.5 or before,
Actually that happened before ME got on board.  They unified EZH with
YOGH in the run-up to Unicode 1.0 and picked the name YOGH.  When they
unified with ISO 10646 in Unicode 1.1, they adopted the ISO name
EZH and the flat-topped glyph.

> and introduced a separate code position for the
> proper one in 3.0.0.
That, indeed, was ME's doing.

--
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan

Reply