From: | Gregory Gadow <techbear@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Tuesday, November 13, 2007, 5:34 |
Thanks for the replies. I've been calling it the dative, but all of the references I've checked were adamant in using it only for an indirect object who was the recipient, never the giver. I don't post often, but it is good to have you all as a resource. Gregory Gadow