Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Pro que continuar le conversation? Re: META: Re: Let's return to conlanging (was: Li Lingue Modern)

From:Jay Bowks <jjbowks@...>
Date:Tuesday, November 3, 1998, 3:16
de: Robert J. Petry <ambassador@...>
ad: Multiple recipients of list CONLANG
thema: Re: META: Re: Let's return to conlanging (was: Li Lingue Modern)
In tu responsa a Ray tu dice...

> >Well, first of all, I am successfully doing that. Just open your eyes abit. >Again, another indirect put down. >I am certainly prepared to accept discussion on the language. Hopefully it
>from those who know something about it, other than the name. And, negatives >stand out.
Il me pare que tu ha un grande sensibilitate pro le opiniones de alteres, varie vices io me dice a me mesme, "non, tu non debe responder a un message tal, plen de insensate e vangloriose parolas... ma... hic me trova io un altere vice facente un responsa, e le consequentias, qui sapera... nonne?"
>No one said the languages have no defects, you dost exaggerate a bit. I
>said repeatedly the "defects" should be corrected by people actually using
>languages, not from those not using them and not speaking from experience
>how they are actually working. In fact, 90% of the criticism on Occidental
>seen on the net so far is based on erroneous information.
Tunc si tu in ver intention vole ameliorar le lingua Occidental/Interlingue, tu deberea auscultar al suggestiones de personas que ha plus experientia que tu in le campo del aux/conlangismo, nonne?
>Certainly, today Occidental is used already by more than any conlang I have >seen discussed here, except Esp. and Ila and possibly Ido. And, the user
>is growing daily.
Io crede que il ha plus personas que usa Volapuk usque nunc quam usa Occidental currentemente, Bob.
>There are several suggested changes to Occidental mentioned in the Cos. >magazines that I would love to ask opinions on here and on auxlang. But,
>as shootin, if I did that someone would ask me to take the discussion >elsewhere. >
Non, non le discussion ma le propaganda plen de information jam vetule face sexanta annos e plus.
>There are some very good reasons Occ and RLR are not more widely used
today, as
>well as the others. And, _it has absolutely nothing to do with the language >being no good as you want to erroneously imply_. But, I won't bore anyone
>all the positive reasons. >
Ecce un costume tue, tu dice que il ha rationes ma continuemente tu non los apuncta infra... esque il ha ver rationes o mermente suppositiones per tu parte, Bob?
>Last thing. I am very glad Ray decided not to leave the list. However, any
>he makes remarks about me like the above, I think I have a right to
respond. "A
>guy [another put down to diminish?] who "seems" [not seems, friend, I am >successful at what I am doing, and that's the problem. People don't like
>to be "pretty" certain. [No I am totally certain.] etc. etc. etc. And, I'll
>glad to list all of the actual successes in the past 6 months, if anyone
>to know what I've done starting from absolute zero. >
Multo ben pro te! Bob, tu crede que tu es alcun cosa nunc, e io spera que illo te reinfortia tu senso de importantia. Ben facite, io non cognosce necun altere que dicerea lo mesme... ma...
>I really don't understand why this bothers you so much Ray? Anyway, as long
>you don't mention me again with negatives, I won't respond with my
>that you still want to do that. I don't think I'm that much of a monster >because I stand up for what I am doing? And, I would like to know why it
>be improper to reply to such statements as made about me above? Is there >anything wrong in that? Thanks. >
Primemente, per favor, Bob, non continua con le aeres de grande commissator e de benefactor de un lingua morte o quasi. Io es secur que tu facera un bon responsa a mi parolas como tu ben volerea exprimer tu pensamentos e isto es bon... ma retornante al thema del conlangismo io te advisarea que in le futuro tu face un inquisition plus definite e plus extensive de tu proprie linguas favorite e tunc tu poterea devenir un ver experto in illos. Como tu non es un conlangista, il es, un autor de un conlang, qual es tu ver intention in remaner al lista de conlang?
>Again, I am very glad you stayed on the list. You are an asset here to >everyone. >
Bon parolas pro continuar le stato commun e le conclusion de un tempore caliente, ma ante le refrigidation del situation esque tu poterea, Bob, dicer nos un responsa al question que se te faceva ante... Si tu non es conlangista, qual es tu intention? E si tu non es interessate in considerar publicamente le defectos o le detalios de con/auxilinguas pro que continuar le conversation con te?
>Al l sue, >Bob, x+ >
Since, (in stereo con/auxlang) Jay B.