Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: THEORY: derivation question

From:Padraic Brown <pbrown@...>
Date:Thursday, March 25, 1999, 22:42
On Thu, 25 Mar 1999, Tom Wier wrote:

> Lars Henrik Mathiesen wrote: > > > Another > > example, as noted by Tolkien: If people had had occasion to talk about > > dwarfs every day, the plural would probably still have been dwarves. > > I don't think I've heard people say "dwarfs" any more than I've heard > people say "leafs"... where'd you get that? >
It threw me for a loop, and no mistake. I'd only ever heard "dwarfs" as a verb. "The skyscraper dwarfs the house next to it" sort of thing. Same with "leafs" and "roofs", both are verbs in my book. Padraic.
> > ======================================================= > Tom Wier <artabanos@...> > ICQ#: 4315704 AIM: Deuterotom > Website: <http://www.angelfire.com/tx/eclectorium/> > "Cogito ergo sum, sed credo ergo ero." > > There's nothing particularly wrong with the > proletariat. It's the hamburgers of the > proletariat that I have a problem with. - Alfred Wallace > ======================================================== >