| From: | J Y S Czhang <czhang23@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tuesday, June 10, 2003, 2:54 |
In a message dated 2003:06:09 07:58:47 AM, chlewey@CABLE.NET.CO writes:><span lang="en"> >This is not an euroclon, but most of the basic vocabulary, and surely a >great deal of the scientific vocabulary is originally based on western >European languages. This western european bias might change if judged >necesary given new information. > >Is anyone ready to the job of trasnlating and breaking the structure of >this language? ></span> > >o papa de nos ke sese in celo >mo i ese santo pe tua nomo >kome a nos tua regino >mo i dones pe tua vilo >ici in terra e la in celo [. . . ]It looks surprisingly like Glosa-like AuxLang, but with a more Romance feel to it like Frater. --- Hanuman Zhang, MangaLanger Language[s] change[s]: vowels shift, phonologies crash-&-burn, grammars leak, morpho-syntactics implode, lexico-semantics mutate, lexicons explode, orthographies reform, typographies blip-&-beep, slang flashes, stylistics warp... linguistic (R)evolutions mark each-&-every quantum leap... "Some Languages Are Crushed to Powder but Rise Again as New Ones" - title of a chapter on pidgins and creoles, John McWhorter, _The Power of Babel: A Natural History of Language_ = ! gw3rraa leg0set kaakaa! ! riis3rvaa, saaIlvaa, riikuu, sk0paa-g0mii aen riizijkl0! = (Fight Linguistic Waste! Save, Salvage, Recover, Scavenge and Recycle!)
| Carlos Thompson <chlewey@...> |