Re: CHAT Cartesian parataxis (was: ANNOUNCE: First longer sentence in S7)

Hi all!

So many postings! :-)

Andreas Johansson <andjo@...> writes:
> Quoting Philippe Caquant <herodote92@...>:
and many others ...

Is there any consensus of how to translate that bl**** sentence then?

However it translates (nice ergative medium construction),
philosophically speaking, I do find it sensible from an egocentric,
which I would call natural, view, especially from a solipsistic view,
that thinking *is* being.

The one-way implication is out of question for me, at least: thinking
implies being.  For others, it seems in question:

I still can think of a view that that is too egocentric for a religion
to allow and that thinking is simply something different of being.

But whatever personal preference... what should the translation be?

**Henrik