Re: Most developed conlang
| From: | kevinurbanczyk@juno.com <kevinurbanczyk@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 21:46 |
|---|
hmmmm,
not an auxlang?
does a philosophical conlang count?, if so, then Ithkuil is way up there...umm, I
need to develop my lexicon more, but mine would be pretty good for the
list...People here will of course rave about Teonaut (spelling?)... Tokana is
pretty high on that list.. so it depends on how one gauges the list.
My main "grey area" category would be 'usability' since that can be tweaked a whole lot of ways...