John Crowe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Which conlang is the most highly developed (in terms of lexicon, grammar,
> usability, etc.) that is not intended in any way to be an auxlang? Just
> wondering.
Would Klingon be in the running for that? It certainly has enough press
and there was a project to translate Shakespear and the Bible into it.
Can't say about any original literature though.
I've heard rumors that Trekkies converse in it.
Dave
--
This message is sponsored by the New Jersey Esperantists.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/esperanto-nj/