Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives

"Raymond A. Brown" wrote:
> Unfortunately, however, 'let' can still be used with the meaning of
> 'permit' and there must, I suspect, still be the odd occasion when, e.g. a
> translator into French must decide whether "let us go!" is 'Laissez-nous
> partir!' or simply 'Partons!'
Indeed, that's the distinction between "let us" and "let's" in spoken
English.  Let us go = Permit us to go; Let's go = 1st person plural
imperative.  In fact, the only time I've ever heard "let us" used for
the "imperative" sense is in certain formal registers like church
language.

--
"It's bad manners to talk about ropes in the house of a man whose father
was hanged." - Irish proverb
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/X-Files
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/Books.html
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-name: NikTailor