|From:||Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>|
|Date:||Thursday, November 4, 2004, 15:48|
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 06:37:41AM +0200, Steg Belsky wrote:
> It would definitely be cool if people wrote
> 20-8-5764, though :-) . Or even 20-2-5764, counting from the "New Year
> for years".
> Although how would you number the intercalated month in leap years?
That very question is no doubt why the count still starts with Nisan
instead of Tishri, because then the extra month falls conveniently
between months 12 and 1 and may be referred to as month 13. :)