Raymond Brown wrote:
> It
> seems our teachers of the 1050s were a little more enlightened than David's.
1050's? :-)
I was actually taught that rule myself, in the 1990's.
> Even tho those Latin infinitives which do consist of two parts, e.g.
> amaturus esse [future active], amatus esse [perfect passive], amatum iri
> [future passive] _can_ be split!
Ironic! :-)
--
Cenedl heb iaith, cenedl heb galon
A nation without a language is a nation without a heart - Welsh proverb
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTaylor42