Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: English notation

From:Roger Mills <romilly@...>
Date:Saturday, June 30, 2001, 6:29
Herman Miller wrote:
>I can't have any _"long"_ vowels before /N/ (although I do have the >diphthong oi before /N/ in a handful of words) -- thus, I've used long >vowels before /N/ as features of alien languages to distinguish them from >English. "Randarong", the name of a city, is natively pronounced >/'randaro:N/ (not /'rænd@rON/ as it would be in my English pronunciation).
Same here, on both counts.
>I have "short" vowels only before intervocalic /r/ (the word "sorry" >/'sQri/ is the only one that comes to mind, but it's possible there are >others). Other vowels before /r/ are so different from non-r-colored vowels >that for a long time I accepted the traditional idea that they're really >the "short" vowels. But I think they're more intermediate between the >"short" and "long" vowels, and a bit closer to the "long" ones. In >particular, the /or/ in "story" contrasts with the /Qr/ in "sorry". I also >distinguish between one-syllable "sear" /sir/ and two-syllable "seer" >/si@r/, although this may be an idiosyncrasy.
I'd write /sir/ 'sear' vs. /siy@r/ or /siyr=/ (syllabic r) 'seer'.....(This is where the never-very-popular usage of /...ihr/, which I mentioned in another post, came in handy.) And "sorry" seems to vary between what you cite and much more casual ['sari]-- homonymous with the Indian ladies garment. It's the old problem of tense/lax neutralization before /r/. _Phonetically_ the vowel in "sear" is neither the [i] of "seat" nor the [I] of "sit", but somewhere in between (at least for me, you, and many others). Same with the vowel of "sore"-- neither that of "boat" nor "bought". In _phonemic_ terms, it seems almost a toss-up whether to assign "sear" etc. to tense /iy/ or lax /i/, and I don't recall offhand what criteria were used in classical phonemics to justify the assignment to /i/-- except perhaps that it just seemed more reasonable. It may well be a distributional thing-- I can't think of very many (any??) mono-morphemic Engl. words with the sequence [ir(V)] ...(phonemic /...iyr(V)/: Leroy? if pronounced as "Lee-roy" (but that's a Name, and ult. foreign anyway; also there's an ancient morpheme boundary in there-- as also in "deride, berate" etc.); note too that "searing" "leering" etc. seem to show the short/lax vowel (at least for me): ['sIrIN, 'lIrIN] (but the syllable boundary is still after the r, and there's the N-problem too. Aargh.) But to pronounce these with tense [i] sounds quite strange.

Replies

Eric Christopherson <rakko@...>
BP Jonsson <bpj@...>