Re: deeply embedded VSO nightmare
From: | Matthew Pearson <matthew.pearson@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, October 23, 2001, 15:33 |
--- William Annis wrote:
Possibly. When I first designed the language, I gave it a
pronounced aversion to separating the V and the S. Perhaps I could
weaken that a bit. My tendency now would be to shift 'aldoven' out to
the front if it goes with 'lero.'
--- end of quote ---
That would be another way to deal with it. Most (all?) verb-initial natlangs allow fronting.
--- beginning of quote ---
>There shouldn't be any problem with this, since I notice you have
>case marking in your language.
Yep. In theory I could do almost anything to disambiguate,
but I feel that if I'm going to insist that the main word order is
VSO, and the modifiers follow the thingie modified, then there had
better be a good reason to go messing about with the word order.
--- end of quote ---
Disambiguation is as good a reason as any. All natlangs--or at least, all the ones I can
think of--have movement/rearrangement rules for dealing with 'heavy'
constituents. No natlang has a completely fixed word order.
Matt.
Matt Pearson
Department of Linguistics
Reed College
3203 SE Woodstock Blvd
Portland, OR 97202 USA
ph: 503-771-1112 (x 7618)