Re: CXS changes

On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 22:03:52 -0600, Herman Miller <hmiller@...> wrote:

>Tristan Mc Leay wrote:
>
>>    - If anyone can think of a replacement symbol for one of them, and
>>      then have <J\> and <j\> as synonyms, that's my preferred choice in
>>      my role as maintainer of CXS. This would probably be the same idea
>>      as how <t_s> and <ts)> are synonyms, but no-one ever uses <t_s>
>>      anymore and I might as well remove it from my chart now that <ts)>
>>      has been so successful. (Unless I've forgotten anyone?)
>
>Is + used for anything in CXS? We could use it for putting a stroke
>through a character in general: [j+] for [J\], [h+] for [X\], [?+] for
>the epiglottal plosive symbol (who remembers what [>\] stands for?), and
>so on. (This is essentially how it's used in APA.)
I like this idea! BTW, what's APA?

gry@s:
j. 'mach' wust

Reply