Re: THEORY: phonemes and Optimality Theory tutorial
From: | Marcus Smith <smithma@...> |
Date: | Thursday, November 16, 2000, 8:47 |
Carlos Thompson wrote:
> > FWIW, I would analyse the above system along the following lines:
> > * Primitives of segmental content are A, I, U.
> > * E and O are made by simultaneous A+I and A+U.
> > * The ability of A to combine with I/U is a property only of
> > stressed syllables. ["Tier separation"]
>
>Well, as a non-linguist I could analize this as
> * Primitives: /a/, /e/, /i/, /o/, /u/
> * In unstressed syllables there are neutralization and /i/ and /e/
>will both be realized as [i] and /o/ and /u/ as [u]. Wouldn't this be
>a correct approximation.
As a linguist but non-phonologist, I would tend towards your analysis as
well. I find it more intuitive and realistic than saying E and O come from
A+I and A+U. And's proposal is certainly possible, but I see no reason for
such a reductionist approach.
===============================
Marcus Smith
AIM: Anaakoot
"When you lose a language, it's like
dropping a bomb on a museum."
-- Kenneth Hale
===============================