Re: Unilang: the Morphology
From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
Date: | Sunday, April 22, 2001, 7:11 |
Oskar Gudlaugsson wrote:
> I say "in theory" because according to what I've read, the whole
> terminology has proven a bit crude
Not "crude", merely that they represent abstractions. "Isolating",
"Fusional/Inflectional", "Agglutinating" were never intended to suggest
completely different systems, but rather convenient classifications of a
continuum.
--
Cenedl heb iaith, cenedl heb galon
A nation without a language is a nation without a heart - Welsh proverb
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTaylor42