Re: OT: What color is blond(e)? (was Re: anti-Sanskritism and more)
From: | <jcowan@...> |
Date: | Sunday, December 7, 2003, 7:46 |
Roger Mills scripsit:
> The pronunciation of the plurals has always amused and perplexed me. In
> Latin class, we learned--
> alumni [a'lumni] and alumnae [a'lumnaj]
>
> BUT-- those who use them say alumni [alumnaj] and alumnae [alumni]*. Go
> figure!
Sure. When the Great Vowel Shift hit Britain, it affected not only English
but also the spoken Latin of the monasteries and lawcourts. That's how
we got [pr\owh&k'vaisi] for "pro hac vice" and [Vltr\@'vajriz] for "ultra vires".
(Oddly, the word "se" seems to be immune, having remained -- or having
been restored to? -- [sei].
See A. P. Herbert's "The Dead Pronunciation".
--
Henry S. Thompson said, / "Syntactic, structural, John Cowan
Value constraints we / Express on the fly." jcowan@reutershealth.com
Simon St. Laurent: "Your / Incomprehensible http://www.reutershealth.com
Abracadabralike / schemas must die!" http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Reply