Re: Re : Re: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answes&proposal

From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html wrote:

> i think that you have one ial for each purpose.
> if you want to stick to ur-stuff, go back to latin and
> smash novial's li. if you want peace on earth go to ro-land
> and analyse tooth-pick as beam-wood-undirt-aaack-'sticked-in.
> i believe the most important criteria for a winning ial is aesthetics though.
> i even know a french conlanger who finds esperanto beautiful.
> but if you want to enslave half the planet, force them to flex
> tense into each verb they pronounce.
I got confused, thought I was posting to AUXLANG ...
People can pick up pidgin syntax in about 5 minutes in speech,
so a "practical auxlang" (logical contradiction) would almost certainly
*be* a pidgin. But in writing, morphology raises its various heads.
And this is just another misplaced thought, please don't sue me.