Re: OT: My reformed X-Sampa (was OT: [Q] is a vowel?! (was Re: Articulatory phonetics (was Re: THEORY: unergative)))
| From: | Peter Bleackley <peter.bleackley@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Tuesday, February 24, 2004, 9:36 |
|---|
Staving Trebor Jung:
>Vowels
>
>rounded, unrounded
>
>(close)
>front
>i, i&
>central
>i@, i&@
>back
>i$, i&$
>(between close and close-mid)
>front
>I, I&
>back rounded
>I&$
>(close-mid)
>front
>e, e&
>central
>e@, e&@
>back
>e$, e&$
>(central unrounded)
>Y
>(open-mid)
>front
>o, o&
>central
>o@, o&@
>back
>o$, o&$
>(between open-mid and open)
>front unrounded
>O&
>central unrounded
>O&@
>(open)
>front
>y, y&
>back
>y$, y&$
>
>Note: (e.g.) Jung /d~.g/ represents XS /ng/ (as opposed to XS /N/).
>
Meþinks ðou art attempting a featural code, especially for the
vowels. Ðou mightst find my (not entirely serious) attempt at a
featural code amusing.
http://listserv.brown.edu/archives/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0309B&L=conlang&P=R2825
Ðis was later named stribography (or, to use ðe correct spelling,
htwvitbveuotkvwvahfi), from ðe Greek for "twisted writing".
Pete