Re: Brithenig/Aelyan North America (was: Re: Languages in theBrithenig universe)

On Fri, 7 Apr 2000 09:49:17 -0400 John Cowan <jcowan@...>
writes:
> andrew wrote:
> > I would like a better name than the Brithenig universe.  That's
> turning
> > into just one part of a shared world of linguafictors.  Any
> suggestions
> > for a proper name for the B.U.?
> I was thinking about that problem last night.  It would be better to
> call
> it the Conlang Shared Universe, but that suggests that every conlang
> fits in it, which many cannot: Tepa does, e.g., but Tokana does not.
> How about the Celtic Universe?  Celtic and Celto-Romance languages
> and
> cultures play a big part in it.
>
> --
> Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan
> <jcowan@...>
.

Hey, could Judean Romance sneak itself into the Brithenig Universe too?
Hmm...why don't we just call the universe after the first conlang that it
was created for?
I don't remember....was it the same universe or a different one which has
the Sefardic colony in North America?
Hmm...that could lead to interesting conculturoreligious issues....Judea
would follow the Yerushalmi tradition, Zêpará (possible Judean name for
the Sephardic American place) would be Bavli....Ashkenazic and Khazaric
traditions could fuse, or not...


-Stephen (Steg)
 "when the conlang's away, the conculture will play..."