Re: Conjunctions
From: | Clint Jackson Baker <litrex1@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, March 19, 2002, 0:48 |
Siyo!
I don't have all the Kayasanoda conjunctions worked
out yet, but here's a sketch of what I do have.
What ones I have are built on the root "hi". As a
suffix this means "with", assuming that the word it is
attached to has a subordinate relation to the word it
precedes. "Hi" also stands alone as the word "and".
And it also stands alone with unagglutinated roots to
create complex connectives:
hi momo: "for" (eg using X for Y = [using] X hi momo
Y)-- momo="for" as in exchange
hi leso: "because"--leso="reason"
hi line: "instead of"--line="not"
and so forth.
Clint
--- Matthew Kehrt <matrix14@...> wrote:
> After reading part of the "Missing Words" thread,
> this came to mind. It
> seems that a lot of languages have similar words for
> conjunctions-
> mostly short, vowel-rich syllables. I was wondering
> what your languages
> use for conjunctions. I'll start by listing the few
> I have for
> Evíendadhail. These can all be used for joining
> lists of words or sets
> of independant clauses.
>
> Í /i/ 'and'
> Ó /um....dunno. English 'long o'/ 'Inclusive or (=
> and/or)'
> Iv /Iv/ 'Exclusive or (= either...or)'
> Sau /sau/ 'but'
>
> That's it so far. How do these compare to yours?
> Similar at all?
> -M
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
http://sports.yahoo.com/