Re: Gzarondan vowels
From: | JS Bangs <jaspax@...> |
Date: | Thursday, June 27, 2002, 22:54 |
Adrian Morgan sikyal:
> Gzarondan has the following vowels (in no particular order).
> Any comments?
>
> * Vowels marked with a star can be followed by [l] within the
> vowel space of the conlang's syllable structure.
I don't understand this comment. Are you saying that a sequence like [6l]
would all be considered a syllabic nucleus? What ramifications does this
have?
> Short:
> * [6]
> * [e] (allophone [{] after /g/, /k/, /j/, /x/)
> [@]
> * [O]
> [U]
> * [I]
> Long:
> [6:]
> [e_y:]
Do you mean for this last part to be rounded? Or did you mean [e_j]?
> [o_w:]
> [l=:]
> [O:]
> * [8:]
> [i:]
> Diphthongs:
> [6I]
> [e8]
> [}u]
> [i8]
Frightful, really. I think the SAMPA makes it look worse than it is, but
it's still an odd collection of phones. No [u]? As an analysis, I would
go with:
Short Long
[6] [6:]
[e] [e_j:]
[@]
[O] [o_w:]
[U] [8:]
[I] [i:]
[l=:]
This is intuitive; if you have some morphology, you might choose to
incorporate patterns like this (or completely unlike this, if you had
something else in mind.)
Jesse S. Bangs jaspax@u.washington.edu
http://students.washington.edu/jaspax/
"If you look at a thing nine hundred and ninety-nine times, you are
perfectly safe; if you look at it the thousandth time, you are in
frightful danger of seeing it for the first time."
--G.K. Chesterton