En réponse à Tristan <kesuari@...>:
> \begin[primarily self-centric]{post}
>
You forgot \end{post}...
> Pristophe Grandsire wrote:
>
No, Pristophe Brandsire!! ;)))
> >
> /me begins wondering about then Pristophe's sanity.
At least I never refer to myself with the third person singular ;))) . Although
pretty much all other persons find their use to refer to myself ;))) .
But then he starts
> wondering about his own... wondering about Pristophe's sanity
> indeed...
> what kind of a stupid, insane waste of time is that? :)
>
True. We yourself stopped wondering about my sanity a long time ago (does it
make sense? It's not supposed to... :(( ). I know that I'm completely nuts. But
hey, we are all mad people in a constant state of hallucination. It just
happens that most of us hallucinate approximately the same thing most of the
time!! :)))
> >
> I suffer from Pristophe's problem (see, I told you P was better. We
> get
> alliteration here!).
Alliteration with problem... Can we switch back to Christophe? I don't like to
alliterate with such a word ;)) . Sristophe would be OK though ;)) .
Except that my Us and Vs look alike, my Ns look
> V-ish, my Ms look like Ns, as do my Rs, my Js look like Ys and my Ys
> like Js or Gs, my Gs look like my Ys some of the time. I also have a
> couple of ligatures. You may need to be practiced to read my
> handwriting, but it's still neat and legible and predictable.
>
I have a nice one: my Bs often look like my Fs ;))) . And my capital Ds like
capital Os. My Rs look like nothing (not even Rs ;))) ). I often switch my Hs
and Ks (especially when I'm in a hurry). And there's no gap between my small
mm, nn or mn/nm. They are ligatured as a single letter with the appropriate
number of bridges ;)) (my whole handwriting is connected, but it often confines
to the fusional ;))) ).
Christophe.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.