Re: preferred voices?
From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
Date: | Sunday, September 24, 2000, 0:32 |
Yoon Ha Lee wrote:
> In English the reason I've often seen (and the reason I avoid it much of
> the time) is that the passive often obscures responsibility.
Altho sometimes the active is downright unnatural. Compare, "a bus hit
me" with "I got hit by a bus", the second is more natural-sounding,
presumably because it has an animate subject.
> or in other stylistic situations.
John walked in the room and Bill immediately hit him. <-- Sounds odd
John walked in the room and was immediately hit by Bill. <-- Sounds
more natural, because it keeps the same noun (John) in subject
position.
Some dialects of Common Watakassí had a *very* strong preference for
antipassive voice, so strong that eventually it became a mere transitive
marker, and the language became accusative.
--
Dievas dave dantis; Dievas duos duonos
God gave teeth; God will give bread - Lithuanian proverb
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTailor