Part 2 Why my conlangs SUCK!!!
From: | David Peterson <thatbluecat@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 21:59 |
Oops: I accidentally hit the "send" button. Bad me.
Anyway, responding to this sentence:
<<Isn't it better that all verbs are
regular and congugate in the same way? Well, maybe
not. *But if not, why not?*>>
The reason behind the "why not" is to make a language more naturalistic.
Natural languages are irregular, so if you want your created language to be
natural-looking, you have to model believable irregularity--and this goes for the
orthography as well as the grammar (but NEVER the romanization--that just
gives us a headache!). With respect to this, though:
<<The chaos of English spelling is rather like the
genetic diversity of an ecosystem. Do we "fix" the
forest by exterminating those life forms that aren't
orderly enough? Heaven forbid! This diversity
provides material for variety that can be exploited by
the poet and the author (ode to a flea), as well as
providing a springboard for future mutations and
modifications.>>
Since English is a real language, we don't have to make it *look* natural, or
protect its naturalness, because it will always be natural. Since that's
the case, why not have a regularized spelling system? It sure would help out a
lot of people (for those arguments, you can go to any sight where an
alternative English orthography is proposed). What will be lost, of course, is the
literature that we've built up that relates to our spelling system. If we
adopted a new spelling system that, for example, got rid of silent e's, what
happens when future generations read literature or see something on TV that talks
specifically about silent e's? They won't know what the heck's going on,
because (ideally) the new orthography would have no silent characters (aside from
diagraphs, which, unless the new orthography has new characters, will no doubt
be necessary). I'm thinking specifically of a segment on a children's
television show called Between the Lions, where they have a criminal called "Silent
E", who goes around town turning kits into kites, rags into rage and hats
into hate, and so forth (when they put him in jail, he asks the guard if he can
take a look at his cap, and the unsupsecting guard hands it to him, and he
turns the cap into a cape and makes his escape!), but there are probably hundreds
of other references in all kinds of literature and media.
-David
Replies