Re: cyrillic?
| From: | Isaac Penzev <isaacp@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Sunday, August 17, 2003, 6:36 |
|---|
Andreas Johansson scripsit:
> Quoting Stone Gordonssen <stonegordonssen@...>:
>
> > Personally, I like the Burmese/Myanmar alpahbet.
> >
> > >i would like to know who thinks cyrillic looks better the the roman
> > >alphabet?
> > >
> > >abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
> > >abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz1234567890-=[]\;',./
>
> Of Latin and Cyrillic, I aesthetically prefer the former, chiefly because its
> having real lower case
Ok, I'll add my two kopecks. Cyrillic is more convenient because it covers wider
range of sounds than Latin. As for aesthetic criteria, Georgian is certainly
No.1. And it has no UPPER case in modern script!!!
~~~~~~Yitzik~~~~~~
Replies