Re: cyrillic?
From: | Tristan McLeay <kesuari@...> |
Date: | Sunday, August 17, 2003, 8:04 |
Thomas R. Ueer ƿraet:
> Quoting Isaac Penzev <isaacp@...>:
>>
>>Ok, I'll add my two kopecks. Cyrillic is more convenient because it
>>covers wider range of sounds than Latin. As for aesthetic criteria,
>>Georgian is certainly No.1. And it has no UPPER case in modern script!!!
>
> I dunno about that. Georgian must be a terror for dyslexics:
> no less than eight of the thirty-three letters look like the
> number three!
Yeah, but it still looks good!
--
Tristan <kesuari@...>
C: I'm sick of hearing about personal responsibility!
I've already *done* my part to make the world a
better place to live.
H: Really?
C: Sure! I was *born*!
H: Oh yes, I forgot to thank you.
C: Join the club!
--Calvin and Hobbes