Lars Henrik Mathiesen <thorinn@...> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 1999, FFlores wrote:
> > "A is the father of B"
> > "B is the son of A"
> > =3D=3D> "A and B are *X"
>=20
> > I'd like to know if this sounds likely and natural
> > (if some natlang has it, preferably).
>=20
> It's not quite the same I know, but Old Norse had the word 'fe=F0gar'
> for a man and his son as a team. Like other similar terms, it could be
> used in apposition to a name: 'L=E9ifr fe=F0gar' means 'Leif and his
> father.'
I think it's just about what I meant, except maybe for
the number: is 'fe=F0gar' a collective (singular) or a
plural form?
--Pablo Flores