THEORY: Can Ditransitive Verbs Agree With More Than Two Core Arguments?
|From:||Tom Chappell <tomhchappell@...>|
|Date:||Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 22:06|
(1) Does anyone know of an attested NatLang with a productive system of agreement
or cross-reference on the verb in which some ditransitive verbs can, or
sometimes must, agree with each of both objects, in one or more of person,
number, gender or noun-class, and/or definiteness or specificity?
I read a comment in somebody's article to the effect that it is an absolute
universal that no verb is ever marked for agreement with more than two of its
core arguments/actants/participants. Is this really true? If it isn't, what's a
It does seem to be at least a statistical conditional universal that the less
case-marked an argument is, the more the verb is marked to agree with it (or
Combine that with the fact that, if there is a case whose mark is zero (an unmarked
case), it is the case that contains the only argument of the intransitive
clause: and we get the conclusion that in ergative monotransitive clauses the
verb agrees with the absolutive argument, but in accusative monotransitive
clauses the verb agrees with the nominative argument.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!