Re: Intergermansk - Three Rings
From: | J. 'Mach' Wust <j_mach_wust@...> |
Date: | Saturday, January 29, 2005, 3:44 |
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:17:34 -0000, caeruleancentaur
<caeruleancentaur@...> wrote:
>--- In conlang@yahoogroups.com, "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@M...> wrote:
>
>IMO, verse ain't verse if it don't rhyme - free verse is neither. :)
>I like the rhythm as well:
I always think that rhythm is more important. Consider that classical Latin
poetry didn't have any rhyme, but only a regular pattern of short and long
syllables (though I think some say that this was artificially copied from
Greek).
>I can't believe that there is someone else in the universe who thinks
>English poetry should rhyme. I thought I was all alone. I will
>accede to the use of rhythm or alliteration or some device not found
>in everyday speech. Poetry today is nothing more the work of the
>type setter.
:)
I'd expect that poetry should preserve the poetic effect even without line
breaks.
kry@s:
j. 'mach' wust