Re: LOTR

I think you have, quite simply, failed to look closely and deeply enough to
realize who and what Tom Bombadil is.  His character appears only briefly,
but that brief moment is essential to understanding the world in which the
Ring-saga can occur.

Adam who won't say another word 'cause it's only satisfying if you find it
yourself

So lift the cup of joy and take a big drink.
In spite of it all it's a beautiful world.
-------Suzanne Knutzen




>From: The Gray Wizard <dbell@...>
>Reply-To: Constructed Languages List <CONLANG@...>
>To: CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
>Subject: Re: LOTR
>Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 13:22:36 -0500
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Matthew Pearson
> >
> > --- And wrote:
> >
> > My main worry is about the pacing. I fear it will be more
> > like Braveheart than Kurosawa or Barry Lyndon; can a mere
> > three films with blockbuster aspirations be sufficient to
> > convey the majesty and grandeur? I also fear a surfeit of
> > nauseating celtickry. But am daring to hope these fears,
> > like the others, will prove unjustified.
> > --- end of quote ---
> >
> > --- Matt replied
> > I share your concerns. I fear that it will end up looking like an
> > SCA convention gone awry--or be perceived that way by the general
> > public. I have a strong aversion to what I call
> > People-in-Funny-Hats movies. The recent sci-fi channel adaptation
> > of "Dune" comes to mind. (Actually, I confess I kind of liked
> > "Dune", but the preponderance of Funny Hats was a distraction.)
> >
> > As for the pacing, keep in mind that they'll probably be
> > abridging the story quite a bit. I hear they've cut out Tom
> > Bombadil entirely--which is a shame given his importance to
> > Tolkien's conception of the Ring, but probably wise, since it
> > would be hard to translate the Bombadil episode to film without
> > making it look silly.
>
>I always found the Tom Bombadil episode the least satisfying in the book.
>Not only would it "be hard to translate the Bombadil episode to film
>without
>making it look silly", but I found even Tolkien's rendition rather silly
><ducking>.  The whole "Hey dol! Merry dol!" thing came across as a bit too
>disneyesque for me.
>
>Nor am I sure that I agree about Tom's "importance to Tolkien's conception
>of the Ring."  After his brief appearance early in the tale, he never
>returns and is referenced only briefly.  It seems to me the story of the
>ring could well be told without him.
>
>Now I'm sure that I have angered the Tom Bombadil fans among us, but this
>is
>just my humble opinion.
>
>Stay curious,
>David
>
>David E. Bell
>The Gray Wizard
>i guronar demith
>ir gonar amis
>www.graywizard.net
>
>Wisdom begins in wonder.
>elivas en ishron ordelmar cotronian
>istran yani godran udhelfas

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

Reply