Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: fallire (was: a King's proverb)

From:Raymond Brown <ray.brown@...>
Date:Wednesday, June 20, 2001, 17:27
At 3:02 pm -0400 19/6/01, John Cowan wrote:
>Raymond Brown wrote: > > >> In fact in Old French the present tense of this verb was as follows: >> 1st sing. _je fail_ > > >Still surviving in English law as "jeofail", the term for an admitted >oversight or mistake in a legal proceeding. The Statutes of Jeofail >permitted lawyers to correct their errors by instituting a new >proceeding as if the original proceeding had never happened.
Wow - you're a source of info on AngloNorman survivals in legal jargon :) Yes. I didn't want to confuse my last mail with all the variants of the pronouns in Old French as well, but "I" appeared not only as _je_ but also as _jo_, _jeo_, and _gie_ (and in OF {j} and soft-g were still [dZ]). I wonder at times whether, if the Pantagenets had successfully held onto their Angevin possession and that, with no Joan of Arc, the crowns of France & England had successfully & really been united, AngloNorman might not have survived and given rise to the common language of the 'united kingdoms of England & France'. There's an idea for a conlang & an alt-history :) Of course, English would then have declined and, possibly, become extinct in England but might've survived in Lowland Scotland (as 'Scots', of course) - but then Gaelic would've been in a stronger position vis-a-vis AngloScots. But one guesses that if the 'united kingdoms of England & France' had remained firm, there would have strong desire to extend the kindom to its "natural boundaries", i.e. to conquer the whole island and, possibly, Ireland. But one could imagine a Gaelic kingdom of Ireland & much of modern Scotland successfully keeping independent. Help! I'd better stop before this gets out of hand. Ray. ========================================= A mind which thinks at its own expense will always interfere with language. [J.G. Hamann 1760] =========================================

Reply

John Cowan <jcowan@...>