Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune

From:Jean-François Colson <fa597525@...>
Date:Sunday, October 9, 2005, 13:35
> There's a little "spelling" mistake in http://fiziwig.com/tinkerfont.html: > ArKyaHrD should be ArKayaHDar.
And AKwaDH should be AKawDH, fghixpqxp should be fghipqxp, and fghiuxvfghi should be fghiuxvxfghi. Two Tinker Toy Fonts with two different sets of pieces are now available at http://users.belgacom.net/bn130627/TinkerFont/. I'm making a TinkerFont font I'll add later. JF
> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gary Shannon" <fiziwig@...> > To: <CONLANG@...> > Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 10:00 PM > Subject: A single font can display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune > > >> Well, almost any. >> >> Returning to the list after an absence of a few >> months, to share an idea I've toyed with off and on >> for a couple of years: The idea that a single font >> could be designed that could be used to display and >> print a huge variety of alphabetic characters, >> syllabaries, pictographs, runes, petroglyphs, >> hieroglyphs, and squiggles. >> >> With such a "universal" font you could invent your own >> writing system for you conlang and would not need to >> create a font for it, because the "tinker toy font" >> would have all the pieces you'd need to display your >> unique writing system. PLUS, your web page, and other >> conlanger's web pages, could display any conlang >> writing system as long as the viewer had the single >> universal Tinker Toy font. >> >> This one single font could display Roman, Greek, >> Devanagari, Korean Hangul, etc. etc. >> >> The simplest version, for runes and crude pictographs >> and alphabets is this one: >> http://fiziwig.com/tinkerfont.html >> >> A more complex, maybe even TOO complex version that >> displays detailed characters is here: >> http://fiziwig.com/tinker.html >> >> I need to find a usable font making program so I can >> try out the simple version and get a feel for how it >> could be improved upon. Maybe the best solution lies >> somewhere between the two extremes in the above two >> links. >> >> --gary >> >

Replies

Isaac Penzev <isaacp@...>
Gary Shannon <fiziwig@...>