Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG)

From:Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...>
Date:Sunday, September 25, 2005, 16:22
Hallo!

Henrik Theiling wrote:

> Hi! > > Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...> writes: > >... > > > For evaluation purposes, I do find the post-fix order easier (too much > > > Reverse Polish, no doubt :) > > > > My personal taste goes more towards a prefix order. But at any rate > > NOT SVO! That's unelegant, and the notions of "subject" and "object" > > doesn't apply well to loglangs anyway. > > Just curious: why 'unelegant'? I can understand that for more than > two arguments, you get an asymmetry that might create the unelegance > feeling.
Yes. I was referring to Lojban-style languages where predicates can have any number of arguments, and surely "X1 P X2 X3 X4" as found (to my meager knowledge) in Lojban is not very elegant, is it?
> But what about langs with only two core arguments? Would > that still be unelegant to you then? For me, in this constallation, > it's equally elegant as any other word order.
True.
> (For me, this is a pure taste question, not an optimality question in > any way.)
Yes. Same to me. Greetings, Jörg.

Reply

Paul Bennett <paul-bennett@...>An elegant distinction (was Re: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG))