----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Bleackley" <Peter.Bleackley@...>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: Collaborative conlanging
> Staving Rob Haden:
> >On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:33:17 +0100, Peter Bleackley
> ><Peter.Bleackley@...> wrote:
> >
> > >I have started up ACollaborativeConlang on the conlang wiki. If anyone
> > >wishes to join in, please check it out.
> > >
> > >Pete
> >
> >I'm interested and I looked at the website, but I have a question.
> >
> >Won't the way you set it up result in a patchwork of perhaps
contradictory
> >ideas? Or is there a mechanism to contest things already submitted?
>
> I did implicitly assume that people would read the previous contributions
> before adding their 2d worth! My solution would be that if somebody
notices
> that rule B contradicts rule A, they should propose rule C to resolve the
> conflict. Some contradictions, on the other hand, might be tolerated as
> "realistic irregulatities".
Hmm. Apparently I'm a collaboration pig. Maybe I've been writing a little
too much.