Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.

Raymond A. Brown wrote:

> In my teens, as I've said, I churned out one IAL after another.
> I didn't discover them - I invented them.  Quite the wrong approach IMO to
> true conlanging.
Amen.  Tarni'f was entirely "invented".  It was heavily influenced by
English, but it wasn't an English relex.  I'd taken Latin earlier, and I
was taking Spanish at the time, so some of it was influenced by Spanish
and Latin.  For example, I had two prepositions for "for", modelled on
_por_ and _para_, but I later made them a little different, but I
*invented* the rules for their use, so that I merely had to look at what
I'd written to know which one to use.  But, over my past few conlangs,
I've discovered that each one developed more slowly.  Why?  I think it's
because I am "discovering" it.  For W., I did'nt set out saying
"circumlocative is used for such-and-such situation", I've *discovered*
when it's used.  My earlier discussion of la'u/kapati' is the same way.
Originally, I intended it to simply cover eating and drinking, but I 've
since discovered that it's really more like "introducing a substance
thru the mouth".

--
"It's bad manners to talk about ropes in the house of a man whose father
was hanged." - Irish proverb
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/X-Files
ICQ: 18656696
AOL: NikTailor