Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
From: | John Cowan <cowan@...> |
Date: | Thursday, October 15, 1998, 21:01 |
Nik Taylor wrote:
> And "more perfect" isn't as good as "perfect"; I think that both of
> those could be thought of as an elided "nearly", i.e., "that beach is
> very nearly empty", "a more nearly perfect union"
"More perfect" in the U.S. Constitution uses the old sense "complete":
a "more complete union" as opposed to the loose union provided by
the Articles of Confederation.
"Perfect tense" is probably the last survivor of this sense in
living use.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)