Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: NATLANG: Latin prefixes with er/ra

From:Ray Brown <ray.brown@...>
Date:Monday, September 20, 2004, 6:42
On Sunday, September 19, 2004, at 02:10 , Muke Tever wrote:

[snip]
> I see two patterns here: > > "Super" is the basic preposition, also used as an adverb,and the one most > used as a prefix in Latin. > "Supra" is a derived adverb; also used as a preposition.
Yep - _supra_ being derived, in fact, from the feminine ablative singular of an adjective.
> Same seems to be the case with "inter"/"intra"
Oops - yes, indeed. I should have included that with _super_ in my previous mail.
> "ulter" is an adjective, and "ultra" is its adverb and preposition, doesn' > t seem to be (much?) used as a Latin prefix.
AFAIK _ultramundanus_ "that which is beyond the world" is the only one from the Classical period.
> Same with "infer"/"infra".
True - and AFAIK "infra" was not used as a prefix in Classical Latin ("infer" certainly wasn't). ===============================================
>
On Sunday, September 19, 2004, at 04:52 , Roger Mills wrote: [snip]
> Ya missed one: (*exter):extra >
Yep - but no need for the asterisk with _exter_. EXTER/ EXTRA exter (alternative form 'exterus') [adjective] = on the outside, outward, of another country. From this are derived: i. [comparative] exterior ii. [superlarive] extre:mus extra: i. [adverb] on the outside; except (follwed by 'quam'. i.e. extra quam = 'except that) ii. [prep. with accusative] outside of, beyond; with the exception of
> I think I might have raised the same questions a long time ago, and Ray > Brown no doubt clarified things....
I have some vague memory of this from many moons ago :)
> My guess would be that at some point, the forms in -er were adjectival; > the > forms in -ra were adverbials regularly derived via the Feminine Ablative.
Spot on!
> Note that in addition to having comparatives in -ior, they _do_ have > superlatives -- in -imus (and a few -emus): supremus, ultimus, infimus, > intimus, extremus --
Yep.
> as well as some derivatives in -nal-: cf. Engl. > supernal, infernal, internal, external.
The Classical Latin equivalents were: supernus, infernus, internus, externus The addition of the redundant -al- seems to be a medievalism. But even with _exter/extra_ we have not exhausted the list of -er/-ra words. If time allows today, I'll chase up a few more for you all ;) Ray =============================================== http://home.freeuk.com/ray.brown ray.brown@freeuk.com =============================================== "They are evidently confusing science with technology." UMBERTO ECO September, 2004