Re: TECH: Attachments (was Re: The Grammatical Sketch)
From: | FFlores <fflores@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, October 12, 1999, 17:29 |
Boudewijn Rempt <bsarempt@...> wrote:
> In sum:
>
> - binary attachments are often unreadable, making them useless
> - binary attachments can be dangerous, making them undesirable
> - binary attachments are often large, makeing them unwanted
I agree on the three. I think we should have a policy (and mini-FAQ)
posted on the list each month or so, or maybe to new members, so
no-one takes it personal. It's really the best for everyone.
--Pablo Flores
http://draseleq.conlang.org/pablo-david/