Re: David qua David

From: "David Peterson" <DigitalScream@...>
> in place-of-articulation, only manner, right? Finally, I'm not quite
> following the last one: [?]>[h]; isn't [?] the lowest one? Upgrading?
>  >>
>
>     Well, as for the approximants to nasals, I did those at the end, and I
> just liked the symetry so much I couldn't resist.  :)  So, no, [j]>[n] is
> palatal approximant to alveolar nasal.  As for [?]>[h], I couldn't think
of
> anywhere else it could go without making a new sound.  And then, which?
Well, /?/ could always disappear to nothing, couldn't it?

Oh, and forget what I said about [H], I found the explanation in your
earlier message.

     *Muke!