From: | daniel andreasson <danielandreasson@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Sunday, May 19, 2002, 14:36 |
John Cowan wrote:> It's typically applied to a conlang (usually an auxlang) based > on the source of the vocabulary: drawn from natlangs (a posteriori) > or not (a priori).Um. I consider my Cein to be a posteriori and it's a daughter lang to Quenya. So you might say that if the vocab is drawn from _any_ specific lang (be it con or nat), then it's a posteriori. ||| daniel -- "Stop that or I'm going to count to 'blorg'." - Omicronian mother on "Futurama".