> --- Ray Brown skrzypszy:
>
> > > That's at least what I would do (and actually did; my page about
> > > Hattic has evoked some discussions about the question whether it is true
> > > or not).
> >
> > Ah, but you have the added advantage that there are already two actual
> > unrelated _natlangs_ called Hattic as well! So that must surely evoke
> > discussion not only about whether it's true or not, but about whether
> > it's the Siberian Hattic or the ancient Anatolian Hattic - much more
> > fun, as you say, especially for unwary Google searchers :-)
>
> *Two* natlangs? I must admit that this is totally new to me. I am astounded. I
> know of course of Anatolian Hattic. But are you saying that there actually is
> another Hattic, spoken in Siberia?
>
> If that it so, I should perhaps rename the language after all... Two languages
> of the same name is one thing; two languages of the same name spoken in one
> country is another.
>
> Jan
>
> =====
> "If you think you are too small to make a difference, try sleeping in a closed
> room with a mosquito."
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
> your friends today! Download Messenger Now
>
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
>
--
Tristan