Re: Another Introduction
| From: | Alex Fink <a4pq1injbok_0@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Thursday, May 29, 2003, 1:16 |
|---|
On Tue, 27 May 2003 12:22:17 EDT, J Y S Czhang <czhang23@...> wrote:
> ::looks to ChristopheG. :: :::runs & hits the Borg Alert button:::
>
> ::BiG GRiN::
Thanks for reminding me, er, us, Hanuman... we forgot to say the following in
our introduction. :-)
We are the Borg. Existence as you know it is over. We will add your
biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Resistance is
futile.
That is to say:
100010010100000111111010101101000010011011110111001001100111
0100011110001110000010110110001000010001001010000110010100001
10110011000110011010001101000010111000010010010100000010110000101100011001000
10011011001001011110000100101000001000100110110010010111100001001010000100000
11111111100011001100111111110
10110100110110100100000010010100001010111000011010111001100010001000001001000
1001001101110010100001
[Nip\anikipiloDatime]
[taCuNak_wureNip\ox_we?u]
[TuJak_wok_wol_0i?uJu?oCocuJoN_woJinariNasuTul_0iNekapowiCulawi?a]
[xak_wuJosupicer_0imoNipoJoJixop\anu]
In the following (doubtless confusing) interlinear, a number in curly braces
denotes the number of arguments which the word takes, Polish notation style.
It may help to know that to assert "x exists" it suffices to say only x.
1000 10010100000
something both {2} exclusive we
11111- 10101011- 01000010011011110111001001100111
(name) 32 bits "Borg" (in ASCII)
0100011110001 11000001- 011
(cessative) {1} something which could be argument 2 of {1}
0110001000010-0-0 10010100001 10010100001
is familiar with {2} you (plural) you
10110011000- 11- 0011
(the conjunction of the following as x[0] ranges over 2 things) {3}
010001101000 01011100001-0-0 10010100000
(future) {1} (causative) {2} we
010110000101100011-0-0 1000 100110-11 00100101111000-0 10010100000
becomes combined with {2} both {2} x[ 0] distinct to {1} we
1000 100110-11 00100101111000-0 10010100001
both {2} x[ 0] distinct to {1} you
000001111111110 0011001100111111110
biological technological
10110100- 11 011010010000-0-0 10010100001
(for all values of x[0] which are) {2} (an event of) tries {2} you
01011100001- 1-0 1011100 1100010
(causative) (causer omitted) {1} not {1} something
0010000010010001-0-0 100110-11 10010100001
is not useful to {2} x[ 0] you
Alex