Re: OT: Family roots?

On 24/05/06, Michael Adams <abrigon@...> wrote:
>
> Family:
> Adams: atleast 1700
I thought the Addams family were created in the 1930s.

> Hayden: c.1632
Make that "c. 1932", if you're talking of the former Australian
Governor-General's birthday.

> Grant: c.1632
> Cover: ?
> Donovan: c.1849
> O'Meara: c.1849
> Delaney: c.1849
Not a clue! (I think there was a teacher at one of my schools whose
surname was "Grant", and while teachers might seem a little
old-fashioned, 1632 is a bit older than I had in mind.)

> Parks: Unknown but atleast pre-civil war.
I would certainly hope so! (Though I suppose the the first park might
not have come before the first civil war.)

> sound familiar to anyone?
Not in the least. Michael, one thing about your posts is they often
seem very apropos of nothing. Could you include a bit of context from
a previous posts so we know what's happening? Also, I have no problems
at all with changing the subject header, but my current mail client
only threads messages based on their subject, so perhaps you could do
something like "OT: Family roots? (was: (old thread subject))",
replacing "(old thread subject)" with whatever the old thread subject
was.

--
Tristan.

Reply