Re: Phoneme winnowing continues
From: | Ian Spackman <ianspackman@...> |
Date: | Thursday, June 5, 2003, 19:47 |
>
>That is the phonetic realization, but I think the pair still counts as
>minimal for T/D. The vowel length by itself is not phonemic;
>[ti:T] and [tiD] are still understood as "teeth" and "teethe"
>rather than the reverse.
OK, just to confuse the issue, I have phonemic vowel length. :)
Dam the river! /d&m/
Damn the river! /d&:m/
I have at least one other minimal pair (lam : lamb); I think there may be
another, but I forget it.
But I prefer the above because I can use it in the same context.
Ian
Replies