Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Phoneme winnowing continues

From:Ian Spackman <ianspackman@...>
Date:Thursday, June 5, 2003, 19:47
> >That is the phonetic realization, but I think the pair still counts as >minimal for T/D. The vowel length by itself is not phonemic; >[ti:T] and [tiD] are still understood as "teeth" and "teethe" >rather than the reverse.
OK, just to confuse the issue, I have phonemic vowel length. :) Dam the river! /d&m/ Damn the river! /d&:m/ I have at least one other minimal pair (lam : lamb); I think there may be another, but I forget it. But I prefer the above because I can use it in the same context. Ian

Replies

Joe <joe@...>
Ian Spackman <ianspackman@...>
Jake X <starvingpoet@...>