Re: Uglossia and Utopia
From: | andrew <hobbit@...> |
Date: | Saturday, September 25, 1999, 3:50 |
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Well, that's correct - what I wanted to add was that merely preserving
> a language does not perserve its unique features, if the culture isn't
> preserved, too. And culture isn't very well preservable...
>
In fifty years time, European-descended New Zealanders will be a large
minority in their own country. It is unlikely that we will have made the
shift to our own cultural identity distinct from global Anglo-culture and
will probably be considered white trash.
Maybe for me, creating Brithenig is part of inventing my own imaginary
cultural identity because my British/European-descended culture is not
strong enough to be sustainable.
> I'm tempted to say, so was I at your age ;-). (But then, I'm
> thirty today, and feel old age creeping on...)
>
I'm 33 and I know that I am no longer immortal. That's not necessarily a
bad thing. We are children of time. Congratulations.
- andrew.
--
Andrew Smith, Intheologus hobbit@earthlight.co.nz
Giles: Honestly, Buffy. You order these products, practice with them for
a morning and then cast them aside in favour of a piece of kindling.
When's the last time you used your hippe?
- Buffy the Vampire Slayer #3, Dark Horse Comics.