Re: Questions about Hungarian
From: | vehke <vaksje@...> |
Date: | Sunday, May 2, 2004, 17:19 |
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 06:51:47PM +0100, Racsko Tamas wrote:
> > acc.pl (-ti)
>
> It's supprising to me: joining two functions (plural and case) into
> one suffix is a flexional behaviour. I hardly believe that the
> agglutinating PFU had it. Not even my Baltic Finnish sources mention
> it. I suppose that it's an particular Lappish development by reversing
> an *-it suffix chain < oblique plural suffix *-i/j + accusative II *-t.
Right, attributed to an error on my part: *-ti is actually mentioned as
PU's partitive suffix (wasn't aware it even had one!).
--
vehke.