Gender in conlangs (was: Re: Umlauts (was Re: Elves and Ill Bethisad))
From: | Muke Tever <hotblack@...> |
Date: | Friday, October 31, 2003, 17:21 |
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:20:19 +0100, Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>
wrote:
> Surely there must have been _some_ grounds for the gender assignments,
> originally, no matter who random they may look after millennia of
> semantic, societal and technological change.
Gender in Kirumb is assigned purely for morphological reasons: whatever
kind of stem-formant a substantive is made from determines whether a word
is m./f./neut., regardless of the meaning of the root; e.g. words in
nomen-actionis <-irí> are all f., words in nomen-agentis <-os> are m., etc.
(However by the time of Atlantic Kirumb grammatical gender has ceased to
be of relevance.)
How do others with conlangs with the familiar masc-fem-neut gender system
assign gender to words?
*Muke!
--
http://frath.net/
http://kohath.livejournal.com/
E jer savne zarjé mas ne (You put music in my heart
Se imné koone'f metha And with the spirit of an artist
Brissve mé kolé adâ. I will make the dreamtime)
Replies